<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 365//365: Day 021 &#8211; Pocket Fighters (PSX)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clgamer.com/2010/01/365-365-day-021-pocket-fighters-psx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clgamer.com/2010/01/365-365-day-021-pocket-fighters-psx/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason V.</title>
		<link>http://clgamer.com/2010/01/365-365-day-021-pocket-fighters-psx/comment-page-1/#comment-6585</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 06:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clgamer.com/?p=4519#comment-6585</guid>
		<description>You do have some valid points that I agree with. Pocket Fighters does have a depth to it, with the gems that power up your special attacks and whatnot. I think my basic gripe was that it really didn&#039;t push me hard enough, and felt like I can go through the motions, without really giving much thought to even the gem power ups, and I can find success. Being so used to the frantic gameplay and quirky matches of various other fighting titles does that to me.

Pocket Fighters really isn&#039;t a bad game, that&#039;s for sure. It&#039;s very &quot;pick up and play&quot; and that does open up the target audience more than a game like Third Strike would. Its success definitely lies in the fact that anyone can pick up a controller, have fun, learn the moves and not feel like they will be overwhelmed. For me personally, I wasn&#039;t thrilled by that fact, but for sure, it&#039;s a good game for those that don&#039;t take the genre too seriously, or for those (such as myself) that won&#039;t let go of games like Third Strike!

Thanks for the comments. Much appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do have some valid points that I agree with. Pocket Fighters does have a depth to it, with the gems that power up your special attacks and whatnot. I think my basic gripe was that it really didn&#8217;t push me hard enough, and felt like I can go through the motions, without really giving much thought to even the gem power ups, and I can find success. Being so used to the frantic gameplay and quirky matches of various other fighting titles does that to me.</p>
<p>Pocket Fighters really isn&#8217;t a bad game, that&#8217;s for sure. It&#8217;s very &#8220;pick up and play&#8221; and that does open up the target audience more than a game like Third Strike would. Its success definitely lies in the fact that anyone can pick up a controller, have fun, learn the moves and not feel like they will be overwhelmed. For me personally, I wasn&#8217;t thrilled by that fact, but for sure, it&#8217;s a good game for those that don&#8217;t take the genre too seriously, or for those (such as myself) that won&#8217;t let go of games like Third Strike!</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments. Much appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico Figueredo</title>
		<link>http://clgamer.com/2010/01/365-365-day-021-pocket-fighters-psx/comment-page-1/#comment-6584</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico Figueredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clgamer.com/?p=4519#comment-6584</guid>
		<description>&quot;lacks depth and strategy when you compare it to such titles as Street Fighter 3: 3rd Strike or any King of Fighters title&quot;

Yes. But this:

a) Does not mean that there is no depth to the game (i.e. different skill levels translate to different match results)

b) Is actually an advantage for a lot of people.

You see, one of the characteristics that many fighting games share is that they cater to a very particular niche.

Pocket Fighters is a great game to have since you can play it with your non-hardcore friends and still have a blast. Best of all, your friends will not feel like idiots because they don&#039;t understand whatever might be going on while you pound their heads into the pavement.

Other than just evaluating the game from a hardcore gamer perspective (and *just* from that perspective) I found the review fun to read and informative. Keep it up =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;lacks depth and strategy when you compare it to such titles as Street Fighter 3: 3rd Strike or any King of Fighters title&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes. But this:</p>
<p>a) Does not mean that there is no depth to the game (i.e. different skill levels translate to different match results)</p>
<p>b) Is actually an advantage for a lot of people.</p>
<p>You see, one of the characteristics that many fighting games share is that they cater to a very particular niche.</p>
<p>Pocket Fighters is a great game to have since you can play it with your non-hardcore friends and still have a blast. Best of all, your friends will not feel like idiots because they don&#8217;t understand whatever might be going on while you pound their heads into the pavement.</p>
<p>Other than just evaluating the game from a hardcore gamer perspective (and *just* from that perspective) I found the review fun to read and informative. Keep it up =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

